The TIGO Guatemala Bribery Scandal: A DOJ Settlement

On November 12, 2025, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) finalized a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with Comunicaciones Celulares S. A. (Comcel), trading as Tigo Guatemala and which later came to be referred as TIGO Guatemala Bribery Scandal. The agreement compels the telecommunications provider to pay $118. 2 million to resolve criminal charges related to a conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). This figure represents one of the most significant corporate penalties levied against a Guatemalan entity in U. S. courts during the 2020s.

The financial structure of the penalty is bifurcated. The DOJ imposed a criminal fine of $60 million, a figure calculated after applying a 50% reduction from the low end of the U. S. Sentencing Guidelines. This reduction acknowledges Millicom International Cellular S. A.’s (the parent company) voluntary self-disclosure and cooperation. The second component is a forfeiture of $58. 2 million, which prosecutors identified as the specific gross pecuniary gain, or “ill-gotten profits”, derived from the bribery scheme.

Table 1: Breakdown of Tigo Guatemala DOJ Financial Penalties (Nov 2025)

Component	Amount (USD)	Description
Criminal Penalty	$60, 000, 000	Punitive fine for conspiracy to violate FCPA anti-bribery provisions.
Administrative Forfeiture	$58, 198, 343	Disgorgement of profits directly linked to corrupt legislative favors.
Total Settlement	$118, 198, 343	Total amount payable to the U. S. Treasury.

The Legal method: Deferred Prosecution

The settlement operates through a Deferred Prosecution Agreement, a legal tool that suspends criminal charges in exchange for compliance. Filed in the Southern District of Florida, the DPA charges Comcel with one count of conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA. Under the terms of the deal, the DOJ agrees to defer prosecution for a period of two years. If Comcel and its parent company, Millicom, adhere to all conditions, including enhanced compliance reporting and continued cooperation, the government dismiss the charges with prejudice after the term expires in late 2027.

Unlike similar FCPA resolutions which mandate an independent compliance monitor, this agreement allows Tigo Guatemala to self-report its progress. The DOJ Millicom’s extensive remediation efforts as the primary reason for this concession. These efforts included terminating senior executives involved in the misconduct and overhauling the company’s internal anti-corruption controls.

Timeline of the Investigation

The route to this settlement was non-linear. Millicom initially self-reported chance irregularities to the DOJ and Swedish authorities in 2015. At that time, investigators closed the case in 2018 without taking action, largely because Millicom absence operational control over its Guatemalan joint venture and could not access incriminating evidence held by its local partner.

Federal prosecutors reopened the investigation in 2020 after new evidence surfaced from independent sources. This second phase of the inquiry revealed a darker to the corruption: funds used for bribes were not just corporate assets included laundered proceeds from narcotrafficking. This, combined with Millicom’s acquisition of full ownership of Tigo Guatemala in 2021, allowed for a complete internal investigation that led to the 2025 admission of guilt.

“The DPA describes a scheme where executives paid monthly cash bribes to Guatemalan congressmen… funds that were sometimes delivered in duffel bags and, in specific instances, traced back to money laundering operations.”

The settlement explicitly names Comcel as the defendant, while Millicom International Cellular S. A. entered into the agreement as a consenting parent entity. This structure places the criminal liability on the subsidiary while binding the Luxembourg-based parent company to the compliance obligations. The agreement marks the major FCPA resolution following the Department of Justice’s 2025 policy shifts regarding corporate enforcement in Latin America.

Millicom International Cellular and the Comcel Subsidiary

The corporate architecture behind the Tigo Guatemala bribery scandal reveals a fractured chain of command that for nearly a decade. Millicom International Cellular S. A., a Luxembourg-based telecommunications giant, held a majority 55% stake in Comunicaciones Celulares S. A. (Comcel) during the period of the illegal payments. The remaining 45% was owned by Miffin Associates Corp, a holding company controlled by local Guatemalan business interests. This joint venture structure created a governance paradox where the majority shareholder possessed limited operational oversight. Federal prosecutors established that the minority partner exercised control over daily management decisions between 2014 and 2020. This control allowed the bribery scheme to flourish while Millicom executives in Luxembourg remained from the granular financial operations in Guatemala City.

The Department of Justice investigation highlighted that the local partner actively obstructed internal compliance audits. Millicom voluntarily reported chance irregularities to U. S. and Swedish authorities in 2015. The minority shareholder blocked Millicom’s attempts to interview key employees or access specific financial records. This obstruction forced the DOJ to close its initial inquiry in 2018 due to a absence of evidence. The investigation remained dormant until 2020 when federal agents received new information from independent sources. The inability of a multinational parent company to audit its own subsidiary became a central theme in the legal proceedings. It demonstrated the risks inherent in joint ventures where local political influence outweighs corporate governance.

A definitive shift in power occurred on November 12, 2021. Millicom executed a strategic buyout of Miffin Associates Corp to seize full operational control of Tigo Guatemala. The transaction was valued at $2. 2 billion in cash. This acquisition represented the largest single foreign direct investment in Guatemalan history at that time. The deal eliminated the minority partner’s influence and allowed Millicom to implement rigorous internal controls. CEO Mauricio Ramos described the move as a necessary step to consolidate the company’s footprint in Central America. The purchase was financed through a loan from a consortium of international banks which was later refinanced through long-term debt issuance.

The Miffin Acquisition: Transaction Specifics (November 2021)

Component	Details
Acquirer	Millicom International Cellular S. A.
Target Entity	Comcel (Tigo Guatemala), Remaining 45% Stake
Seller	Miffin Associates Corp (Local Partner)
Transaction Value	$2. 2 Billion (USD)
Financing Method	Loan & Equity Rights Offering
Strategic Outcome	100% Ownership & Full Operational Control

The consolidation of ownership proved important for the resolution of the criminal case. Millicom granted the DOJ unrestricted access to Comcel’s internal records immediately after the 2021 acquisition. This cooperation stood in clear contrast to the obstruction faced by investigators during the previous decade. The company provided evidence that implicated former executives and detailed the method used to funnel cash to government officials. The DOJ this post-acquisition cooperation as a primary factor in granting the 50% reduction in the criminal penalty. Prosecutors acknowledged that Millicom could not have prevented the misconduct earlier due to the specific legal constraints of the joint venture agreement.

Financial markets reacted to the 2025 settlement with cautious optimism. Millicom stock (NASDAQ: TIGO) rose 3. 58% on the day the Deferred Prosecution Agreement was announced. Investors interpreted the $118. 2 million penalty as a manageable cost to remove a long-standing regulatory cloud. The certainty provided by the settlement allowed the company to focus on its operational strategy in Latin America. Tigo Guatemala remains a serious asset for the group and generates significant cash flow. The unit reported revenue of approximately $1. 6 billion in 2021. The full integration of Comcel allows Millicom to direct these funds toward debt reduction and network expansion without the friction of a minority partner.

The resolution of the Comcel case serves as a warning for multinational corporations operating in high-risk jurisdictions. It demonstrates that majority ownership does not guarantee control. The DOJ made it clear that companies must ensure they have the legal authority to enforce compliance standards across all subsidiaries. Millicom paid a steep price for its years of limited visibility. The $2. 2 billion buyout secured the asset the subsequent $118. 2 million penalty addressed the legacy of corruption that the joint venture structure had concealed.

The Joint Venture Liability Defense and Operational Control

The legal architecture of the Tigo Guatemala bribery scheme rested on a specific corporate fracture: the gap between ownership and operational control. Between 2014 and 2020, Millicom International Cellular S. A. held a 55% majority stake in the Guatemalan entity. Yet the U. S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filings reveal that actual power resided with the minority partner, Miffin Associates, a Panamanian holding company controlled by Mario López Estrada. This 45% shareholder exercised “substantial control” over daily operations and leveraged this position to direct the bribery apparatus while actively blocking Millicom’s compliance oversight.

Federal prosecutors detailed how this governance structure allowed the local partner to bypass the nominal majority owner. The DOJ Statement of Facts confirms that “Shareholder 1” (identified as López Estrada) and other executives used their operational dominance to prevent Millicom from accessing serious financial data. When Millicom attempted to investigate internal irregularities in 2015, the local partner obstructed the inquiry and prevented Tigo Guatemala employees from cooperating with the Fraud Section. This obstruction was so that the DOJ initially closed its investigation in 2018 before reopening it in 2020 upon receiving new evidence.

The mechanics of the bribery required total autonomy from Millicom’s central audit teams. Executives loyal to the minority partner generated illicit cash through four primary channels. These included inflating invoices with companies owned by López Estrada, backdating contracts for non-existent services, and executing a “put-call” agreement that triggered a $15 million fee paid by Millicom to the minority partner. In one particularly brazen method, cash was physically transported to Tigo Guatemala’s offices via helicopter or delivered in duffel bags to members of the Guatemalan Congress. The funds were then used to secure favorable legislation, including a 2014 law that protected Tigo’s market dominance against competitors.

The table outlines the ownership and control during the height of the conspiracy.

Tigo Guatemala Ownership & Control Structure (2014, 2020)

Entity	Ownership Stake	Operational Role	DOJ Status
Millicom International Cellular	55%	Majority Owner	absence operational control; blocked from compliance oversight.
Miffin Associates (López Estrada)	45%	Minority Partner	Exercised “substantial control”; directed bribery payments.
Tigo Guatemala Executives	N/A	Management	Reported to minority partner; executed cash deliveries.

Millicom resolved this governance emergency through a massive capital deployment. On November 12, 2021, the Luxembourg-based giant acquired the remaining 45% stake from Miffin Associates for $2. 2 billion in cash. This transaction extinguished the joint venture and transferred absolute control to Millicom. The acquisition was not a commercial expansion. It was a necessary step to the rogue power structure that had facilitated the corruption. By taking 100% ownership, Millicom assumed full successor liability also gained the ability to enforce the remediation measures required by U. S. authorities.

The DOJ’s settlement acknowledges this shift. Prosecutors granted Millicom a 50% reduction off the bottom of the applicable sentencing fine range. This credit reflects the company’s initial voluntary disclosure in 2015 and its subsequent cooperation after acquiring full control in 2021. The case serves as a warning to multinational corporations operating in high-risk jurisdictions. Holding a majority stake offers no protection against Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) liability if a minority partner retains the practical ability to authorize corrupt payments and conceal the evidence.

Acisclo Valladares Urruela, the former Chief Corporate Affairs Officer who reported to the minority partner, played a central role in the financial logistics. He admitted to laundering money through U. S. bank accounts to pay the bribes. His testimony and the subsequent financial trail provided the “new evidence” that allowed the DOJ to revive the case after the 2021 buyout. The $118. 2 million penalty paid by Tigo Guatemala closes the chapter on the joint venture era, placing the load of future compliance squarely on Millicom’s centralized management.

The Architect in the Shadows: Mario Lopez Estrada

At the center of the Tigo Guatemala bribery conspiracy stands the figure identified in Department of Justice documents only as the “Minority Shareholder.” This individual is Mario Lopez Estrada, a telecommunications tycoon widely recognized as Guatemala’s billionaire. While Millicom International Cellular S. A. held a 55% majority stake in the joint venture during the bribery period (2014, 2017), federal prosecutors found that Lopez Estrada and his local executives maintained operational control. This control allowed them to block internal audits and direct a sophisticated bribery scheme that funneled millions of dollars to government officials, insulating the European parent company from the day-to-day criminal activity.

The financial magnitude of Lopez Estrada’s exit from the company remains a focal point of the scandal’s aftermath. In November 2021, just as the U. S. investigation was intensifying, Millicom agreed to purchase Lopez Estrada’s remaining 45% stake for $2. 2 billion in cash. This transaction granted Millicom full ownership also transferred the entire corporate liability for the past crimes onto its balance sheet. The timing of the sale allowed Lopez Estrada to liquidate his position at peak valuation, securing a massive fortune derived partly from the market dominance secured through the very bribery schemes detailed in the 2025 settlement.

Federal investigators uncovered a payment method that relied on physical cash transfers rather than wire transactions, a method designed to defeat international banking compliance filters. The DOJ’s Statement of Facts reveals that the conspiracy utilized “narcotrafficking proceeds” to fund specific bribe payments. Executives working under Lopez Estrada’s direction collaborated with corrupt financiers to launder drug money, which was then delivered in duffel bags to politicians. This integration of corporate strategy with organized crime money laundering marks a severe escalation compared to typical FCPA violations involving wire transfers or consulting contracts.

Timeline of Control: The Rise and Exit of the Minority Shareholder

Year	Event	Financial Impact
1993	Lopez Estrada acquires stake in state-owned Comcel (later Tigo).	Entry into telecom monopoly.
2015	Forbes names Lopez Estrada as Guatemala’s billionaire.	Net worth exceeds $1. 0 billion.
2017	Bribery scheme peaks to secure 4G LTE spectrum and legislation.	Market share consolidation.
2020	U. S. prosecutors indict key lieutenant Acisclo Valladares Urruela.	Investigation becomes public.
2021	Millicom buys Lopez Estrada’s 45% stake.	$2. 2 billion cash payout.
2023	Mario Lopez Estrada dies (March 20).	Personal criminal liability extinguished.

The operational structure of Tigo Guatemala under Lopez Estrada functioned as a state-within-a-state. Having served as the Minister of Communications in the late 1980s, Lopez Estrada possessed an intimate understanding of the Guatemalan regulatory. His network allowed Tigo to influence the drafting of telecommunications laws directly. Evidence collected by the DOJ indicates that Tigo executives drafted legislative language that was subsequently passed by the Guatemalan Congress, purchasing the regulatory environment required to maintain their market dominance against competitors like Claro (América Móvil).

Lopez Estrada died on March 20, 2023, two years before the final Deferred Prosecution Agreement was signed. His death extinguished the possibility of personal criminal prosecution in the United States. Consequently, the $118. 2 million penalty falls entirely on the corporate entity he left behind. While the company faces the financial load and a three-year reporting requirement, the personal fortune amassed during the bribery era remains largely intact within his family’s holding company, Grupo Onyx, which has since diversified into real estate and energy across Paraguay and Guatemala.

The Helicopter Cash Deliveries and Duffel Bag Logistics

The Department of Justice’s Statement of Facts, released alongside the November 2025 deferred prosecution agreement, exposes a bribery method defined by its brazen absence of subtlety. Between 2012 and 2014, the primary logistical method for transporting illicit funds to Tigo Guatemala’s corporate offices involved private helicopters loaded with duffel bags of cash. This “airlift” strategy was not a one-time anomaly a systematic operation designed to move massive quantities of physical currency, Quetzales and U. S. dollars, past standard banking controls directly into the hands of Acisclo Valladares Urruela, the company’s Chief Corporate Affairs Officer.

Federal prosecutors established that “Shareholder 1,” a Guatemalan citizen who held a 45% stake in the joint venture, orchestrated these deliveries. Using aircraft associated with his separate business empire, Shareholder 1 directed the transport of approximately $18. 3 million (142, 025, 000 Quetzales) in cash to Tigo’s headquarters over a two-year period. The funds were physically offloaded at the company’s premises, where Valladares accepted custody. These deliveries were tracked with bureaucratic precision; a May 2014 email from a senior executive in Shareholder 1’s consortium explicitly accounted for 27 separate cash drops made between June 2012 and May 2014.

Table 5. 1: The “Air- ” Cash Logistics (2012, 2014)

Operational Component	Details Verified by DOJ Statement of Facts
Transport Method	Private helicopters owned/operated by Shareholder 1’s business network.
Cargo	Duffel bags, backpacks, and briefcases filled with untraceable currency.
Destination	Tigo Guatemala Corporate Offices (Guatemala City).
Primary Recipient	Acisclo Valladares Urruela (Chief Corporate Affairs Officer).
Total Volume	~142, 025, 000 Quetzales ($18. 3 Million USD).
Frequency	27 documented deliveries over 23 months.

The physical handling of the bribes required a high degree of operational security, which eventually failed. In 2013, the scheme faced a near-fatal exposure when one of the cash-laden helicopters was forced to make an emergency landing at a Guatemalan military base due to mechanical or weather problem. The base commander witnessed the couriers offloading heavy bags of cash and reported the incident to local authorities. While this triggered an initial investigation, the influence of the conspirators allowed the scheme to continue temporarily. yet, this “close call” forced Shareholder 1 and Valladares to abandon the helicopter method in mid-2014 in favor of more sophisticated financial, including the “put-call” execution fee method.

Once the cash arrived at Tigo’s offices, it entered a secondary distribution network. Valladares maintained a stash of “clean, untraceable cash” to pay monthly bribes to politicians. The distribution followed two main patterns: either Valladares personally delivered the money to members of Congress, or the politicians, and their security teams, visited Tigo’s offices to collect their payments. These transactions were so frequent that the conspirators developed code names for the bribes. Evidence from the CICIG (International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala) investigation, which parallels the DOJ findings, indicates that payments to lawmakers were frequently referred to as “champurradas” (a type of Guatemalan cookie) to disguise their nature in communications.

“Valladares Urruela regularly received backpacks, duffel bags, and briefcases full of dirty, untraceable cash… His demand for bribe cash was allegedly so great, he once remarked to a co-conspirator that politicians must think money grows on trees.”
, U. S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Florida (2020 Charging Documents)

The logistical demand for physical cash eventually outstripped the capacity of Shareholder 1’s legitimate businesses. To maintain the flow of bribes, Valladares and his accomplices began laundering funds from other sources, including proceeds from narcotics trafficking. This escalation involved Alvaro Estuardo Cobar Bustamante, a director at a Guatemalan bank, who facilitated the conversion of illicit drug money into the cash required for the “champurradas.” This pivot from corporate funds to laundered narco-capital marked a serious deepening of the criminal conspiracy, exposing Tigo Guatemala not just to corruption charges, to direct entanglement with organized crime finance.

Laundering Narcotrafficking Proceeds for Political Bribery

The Department of Justice’s November 2025 settlement with Tigo Guatemala exposed a criminal convergence rarely seen in corporate enforcement actions: the direct use of narcotics trafficking proceeds to fund political bribes. While standard Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) cases involve the illicit transfer of corporate funds to officials, the Tigo scheme required such vast quantities of untraceable physical cash that executives turned to the drug trade to meet their liquidity needs.

According to the Statement of Facts attached to the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA), the bribery apparatus was overseen by Acisclo Valladares Urruela, Tigo’s former Chief Corporate Affairs Officer. To secure the passage of the 2014 “Tigo Law” (Decree 12-2014) and other favorable legislation, the company needed to deliver millions of dollars in cash to members of the Guatemalan Congress. The sheer volume of physical currency required, frequently delivered in duffel bags, backpacks, and even by helicopter, created a logistical bottleneck that traditional corporate embezzlement could not satisfy quickly enough.

The “Double Wash” method

To solve this liquidity emergency, Valladares Urruela and his co-conspirators, including Guatemalan banker Alvaro Estuardo Cobar Bustamante, engineered a method that simultaneously served the interests of the telecommunications giant and local narcotics traffickers. The scheme operated on a simple supply-and-demand: Tigo needed clean cash to pay bribes, while drug cartels needed to launder their dirty cash into the banking system.

Federal prosecutors established that Valladares Urruela swapped Tigo’s corporate funds for street-level drug money. The process involved multiple of obfuscation:

Operational Flow of Illicit Funds (2014, 2018)

Stage	Action	Purpose
1. Corporate Extraction	Tigo executed sham contracts with shell companies controlled by conspirators.	To move legitimate corporate funds out of Tigo’s accounts under the guise of “consulting” or “services.”
2. The Swap	Intermediaries exchanged the corporate wire transfers for physical cash held by narcotics traffickers.	To obtain untraceable bills while allowing traffickers to receive “clean” wire transfers.
3. Distribution	Valladares Urruela and security teams delivered the cash to government officials.	To purchase votes for the “Tigo Law” and influence regulatory decisions.

The DOJ’s 2020 indictment of Valladares Urruela, which laid the groundwork for the 2025 corporate settlement, detailed that the executive “enabled the illegal drug trade by creating a demand for untraceable cash.” By purchasing this cash from traffickers, Tigo executives provided a laundering service for the cartels, washing approximately $10 million in drug proceeds through the U. S. and Guatemalan financial systems to finance their political corruption.

Role of the Banking Sector

The scheme relied heavily on the complicity of the banking sector. Alvaro Estuardo Cobar Bustamante, a director at a national Guatemalan bank, facilitated these transactions by bypassing anti-money laundering (AML) controls. Cobar Bustamante, who was sentenced to prison in 2022, used his position to ensure that the large inflows of corporate cash and the corresponding withdrawals did not trigger suspicious activity reports (SARs).

In recorded conversations by the FBI, Cobar Bustamante agreed to accept funds he believed were drug proceeds and move them into the United States. This banking channel was serious for Valladares Urruela, who needed to ensure that the bribes paid to politicians, such as the monthly payments to the then-Vice President Roxana Baldetti and various deputies, could not be traced back to Tigo’s corporate accounts.

The 2025 DPA explicitly notes that the involvement of narcotrafficking proceeds was a significant aggravating factor in the penalty calculation. While Millicom, Tigo’s parent company, received credit for self-disclosure, the fact that its subsidiary’s executives were knowingly washing drug money to subvert the democratic process in Guatemala elevated the severity of the offense. The DOJ emphasized that this was not a case of bribery, a complex financial crime that strengthened the operational capacity of transnational criminal organizations.

The Executive Conduit: Acisclo Valladares Urruela

At the center of the Tigo Guatemala bribery network stood Acisclo Valladares Urruela, a figure who direct bridged the divide between corporate executive power and high-level political office. Serving as Tigo’s Chief Corporate Affairs Officer and Head of Legal from 2008 to 2015, and returning in 2017, Valladares acted as the primary architect for the company’s illicit cash-for-votes. His role extended beyond mere legal counsel; federal prosecutors identified him as the operational “conduit” who physically managed the flow of bribes to Guatemalan legislators.

Valladares’s objective was specific and highly profitable: securing the passage of the 2014 “Control Law” (frequently referred to locally as the “Tigo Law”). This legislation granted Tigo a 20-year renewal of its spectrum rights without a competitive bidding process, locking in the company’s market dominance. To achieve this, Valladares did not rely solely on corporate accounts. Instead, he orchestrated a complex money laundering system that utilized drug trafficking proceeds to fund corporate bribes.

The Narco-Bribery Nexus

The mechanics of Valladares’s operation revealed a disturbing convergence of corporate malfeasance and organized crime. According to the Statement of Facts accompanying his 2022 guilty plea, Valladares worked with Alvaro Estuardo Cobar Bustamante, a corrupt banking executive, to generate the massive amounts of cash required to pay off politicians. When Tigo’s internal slush funds proved insufficient or too risky to access directly, Valladares accepted cash from narcotics traffickers who needed to launder their profits.

Valladares received this dirty money, frequently delivered in duffel bags, backpacks, and briefcases, and used it to pay bribes. In doing so, he solved two problems simultaneously: he provided a laundering service for drug cartels and secured untraceable cash for Tigo’s political payoffs. Prosecutors noted that the volume of cash was so high that Valladares once remarked to a co-conspirator that politicians “must think money grows on trees.”

Timeline of Valladares Urruela’s Involvement and Prosecution

Period	Role / Activity	Key Event
2014	Tigo Chief Corporate Affairs Officer	Orchestrates bribery of Congress to pass the “Tigo Law” (Spectrum Renewal).
2018, 2020	Minister of Economy (Guatemala)	Leaves Tigo to join the cabinet of President Jimmy Morales; loses immunity in Jan 2020.
Aug 2020	Fugitive / Defendant	Indicted by DOJ (S. D. Florida) for laundering ~$10 million in drug and bribery proceeds.
July 2022	Cooperating Witness	Pleads guilty to money laundering conspiracy; agrees to cooperate with U. S. prosecutors.
Oct 2022	Convict	Sentenced to 12 months and one day in U. S. federal prison.
Nov 2025	Key Witness	His testimony and evidence underpin the $118. 2 million penalty against Tigo/Comcel.

From Corporate Office to Cabinet

Valladares’s influence peaked when he transitioned from Tigo executive to the Guatemalan government, serving as the Minister of Economy under President Jimmy Morales from 2018 to 2020. This position provided him with diplomatic immunity and further entrenched the relationship between the telecommunications giant and the state. yet, once the Morales administration ended in January 2020, Valladares lost his immunity. Anticipating prosecution, he fled Guatemala, eventually surrendering to U. S. authorities.

The “Helicopter Incident” remains one of the most brazen examples of his operation. In 2013, a helicopter transporting cash destined for Valladares made an emergency landing at a military base. The base commander observed the offloading of cash-filled bags, triggering a local investigation. To evade scrutiny, Valladares and his co-conspirators, including “Shareholder 1” (identified as the late Mario Lopez Estrada), shifted tactics. They began using sham contracts and inflated invoices to generate cash, a method that continued until the scheme unraveled.

His 2022 plea agreement in the Southern District of Florida, where he admitted to transferring $350, 000 in illicit funds and receiving $140, 000 personally, became the catalyst for the broader investigation into Millicom and Tigo. By turning state’s evidence, Valladares provided the DOJ with the internal communications, ledgers, and testimony necessary to prove that the bribery was not the act of a rogue employee, a widespread corporate strategy.

Legislative Capture and the Telecommunications Law of 2014

The mechanics of Tigo Guatemala’s market dominance were not the result of superior service or competitive pricing, the product of a purchased legislative framework. Federal prosecutors in the United States and anti-impunity investigators in Guatemala have confirmed that the passage of Decree 12-2014, officially titled the “Law for the Control of Mobile Telecommunications in Prisons and Strengthening of Infrastructure for Data Transmission,” was the direct result of a multi-million dollar bribery scheme. While the law was publicly sold to the Guatemalan electorate as a security measure to block extortion calls from prisons, its technical provisions contained a “Trojan horse” designed to grant Tigo unrestricted access to public and private land for infrastructure expansion.

On November 12, 2025, the U. S. Department of Justice (DOJ) confirmed that Tigo executives, including former Chief Corporate Affairs Officer Acisclo Valladares Urruela, directed a stream of illicit payments to members of the Guatemalan Congress to secure the law’s passage. The 2025 Statement of Facts reveals that between 2012 and 2014 alone, approximately $18. 3 million in bribes were funneled to government officials. These payments were frequently delivered in duffel bags filled with cash, of which prosecutors allege was sourced from laundered narcotrafficking proceeds to ensure sufficient liquidity for the payoffs.

The “Trojan Horse” Strategy

The legislative capture occurred on April 8, 2014, when the Guatemalan Congress approved Decree 12-2014 under a motion of “national urgency.” This parliamentary maneuver bypassed standard committee review and allowed the law to pass in a single session with little debate. The voting bloc included a suspicious alliance between the ruling Patriot Party (PP) and the opposition Lider party, political rivals who set aside their differences to approve the measure.

The text of the law reveals the commercial quid pro quo. While the initial articles mandated that telecom operators install signal jammers in penitentiaries, a popular public safety demand, the subsequent articles stripped municipalities of their autonomy to regulate cell tower construction. The law the Superintendency of Telecommunications (SIT) as the sole authority for approving infrastructure, allowing Tigo to bypass local community opposition and municipal taxes. Under the new regime, if the SIT did not reject a permit application within 15 days, it was automatically approved by “administrative silence.”

Legislative Provision	Public Justification	Commercial Benefit to Tigo
Prison Signal Blocking	Stop extortion calls from inmates.	Provided the political cover (“Trojan Horse”) to pass the bill urgently.
SIT Centralization	Standardize regulations.	Removed municipal authority to block tower construction or charge local fees.
Administrative Silence	Reduce bureaucratic red tape.	Guaranteed automatic approval of tower permits if SIT failed to respond in 15 days.
Right of Way	Expand coverage.	Granted unrestricted access to install fiber optics and towers on public and private property.

The Cash-for-Votes method

Evidence presented by the International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG) in the “Subordination of Legislative Power” case (2019) and corroborated by the 2025 DOJ settlement outlines the specific mechanics of the bribery. Deputies were paid bimonthly stipends, frequently as Q50, 000 (approximately $6, 400), to ensure their compliance. These payments were known internally as the “champagne” that kept the legislative lubricated.

Acisclo Valladares Urruela, who later served as the Minister of Economy, played a central role in this distribution. According to his 2020 U. S. criminal complaint and subsequent admissions, Valladares utilized the banking system and cash deliveries to satisfy the “bancada” (caucus) leaders. The demand for cash was so high during the negotiation of Decree 12-2014 that executives had to resort to laundering funds from third-party sources to meet the payment schedule. The DOJ’s 2025 findings indicate that Tigo’s leadership viewed these payments not as optional lobbying, as a mandatory operating expense to secure a legislative monopoly that competitors could not match.

The economic impact of this legislative capture was immediate. By stripping municipalities of their ability to levy “arbitrios” (local taxes) on cell towers, Tigo saved millions in operating costs while simultaneously accelerating its network density at a rate its competitors could not legally challenge. The law privatized the country’s legislative process, turning the Congress of the Republic into a subsidiary arm of the telecommunications giant.

The Failed 2015 Self-Disclosure and Initial Case Closure

The trajectory of the Tigo Guatemala bribery scandal is distinguished by a rare procedural anomaly: a voluntary self-disclosure that initially resulted in no enforcement action, only to be resurrected years later with far more severe allegations. In October 2015, Millicom International Cellular S. A. formally method the U. S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Swedish Prosecution Authority to report chance improper payments within its Guatemalan joint venture. This proactive step, a method to secure leniency, exposed the severe governance limits Millicom faced within its own subsidiary.

At the time of the disclosure, Millicom held a 55% equity stake in Comunicaciones Celulares S. A. (Comcel), trading as Tigo Guatemala. even with this majority ownership, a shareholder agreement granted operational control to its local partner, a Panamanian entity holding the remaining 45%. When Millicom’s internal compliance channels flagged suspicious transactions, the company attempted to investigate hit an immediate firewall. The local partner, who allegedly orchestrated the bribery scheme, used their operational authority to block Millicom’s auditors, restrict access to financial records, and prevent Tigo Guatemala employees from being interviewed.

The 2018 Case Closure

The DOJ’s initial investigation, by the 2015 report, for nearly three years. yet, federal prosecutors faced the same obstruction that stymied Millicom. Without cooperation from the entity on the ground, and absence the smoking gun evidence that would later emerge from third-party witnesses, the trail went cold. On April 23, 2018, the DOJ notified Millicom that it was closing its inquiry without bringing charges. The Swedish Prosecution Authority had already discontinued its own preliminary investigation in 2016 on jurisdictional grounds.

This closure created a dangerous interim period. While the investigation was technically “closed,” the criminal conduct was not. Court documents released in 2025 revealed that the bribery scheme did not stop after the 2015 self-disclosure. Instead, the corrupt payments to Guatemalan officials continued unabated through June 2018, occurring even as Millicom’s lawyers were negotiating the case closure with the DOJ. The local partner’s ability to shield these ongoing crimes from the parent company turned the 2015 disclosure into a “failed” attempt at remediation, delaying the eventual reckoning by nearly seven years.

Timeline of the Stalled Investigation

The following table outlines the serious events between the initial self-disclosure and the reopening of the case, highlighting the gap between Millicom’s corporate maneuvering and the reality on the ground in Guatemala.

Table 9. 1: The 2015-2020 Investigation Gap

Date	Event	Key Detail
October 21, 2015	Voluntary Disclosure	Millicom reports chance improper payments to DOJ and Swedish authorities.
May 4, 2016	Swedish Case Closed	Swedish prosecutors drop the case due to absence of jurisdiction over the Guatemalan entity.
2015 , 2018	Internal Obstruction	Tigo Guatemala’s minority partner blocks Millicom’s access to books, records, and witnesses.
April 23, 2018	DOJ Case Closed	DOJ informs Millicom it has closed the investigation without action.
June 2018	Bribery Continues	The bribery scheme remains active for two months after the DOJ closes its file.
2020	Investigation Reopened	DOJ receives new evidence from external sources linking payments to narcotrafficking proceeds.

The failure of the 2015 disclosure was not a failure of intent by the parent company, a failure of control. The DOJ’s 2025 settlement documents explicitly acknowledged this. Prosecutors noted that Millicom “absence operational control” during the phase and was “unable to access serious information.” This distinction became important in the final penalty calculation; although the 2015 disclosure did not stop the crime immediately, the DOJ eventually credited Millicom for the attempt, granting a 50% reduction in the criminal fine once the company acquired full control in 2021 and provided the cooperation that was impossible a decade earlier.

The 2020 Reopening: A Case Resurrected

The Department of Justice (DOJ) rarely resurrects a closed investigation without significant cause. In 2018, federal prosecutors formally closed their initial inquiry into Millicom International Cellular S. A. and its Guatemalan subsidiary, Comunicaciones Celulares S. A. (Comcel), citing a absence of evidence. At that time, Millicom had voluntarily disclosed chance irregularities discovered in 2015. Yet, the case lay dormant for only two years. In 2020, the DOJ’s Fraud Section reopened the file, driven by new, external evidence that contradicted the company’s initial limited disclosures. This revival was not a mere administrative review; it was triggered by the discovery that the bribery scheme had continued well past the 2015 self-reporting date and involved the laundering of illicit funds through U. S. banks.

Federal investigators found that the scope of the corruption was far wider than originally understood. The 2020 breakthrough came from sources outside the company, specifically linking the bribe payments to proceeds from narcotics trafficking. Prosecutors established that between 2012 and 2018, Tigo Guatemala executives directed millions of dollars in cash to government officials. The evidence painted a picture of a “widespread and systematic” operation where Tigo executives, absence access to legitimate corporate funds due to Millicom’s compliance checks, turned to money launderers to generate the necessary cash for payoffs.

The Valladares Indictment and the “Duffel Bag” Testimony

The pivot point for the investigation was the 2020 indictment of Acisclo Valladares Urruela, Tigo’s former Chief Corporate Affairs Officer and a former Guatemalan Minister of Economy. U. S. prosecutors charged Valladares with conspiring to launder close to $10 million in illegal drug proceeds. The affidavit filed by the FBI detailed a brazen method for moving money: Valladares allegedly received “backpacks, duffel bags, and briefcases” full of cash, which he then used to bribe Guatemalan politicians.

Witness testimonies described scenes where helicopters transported cash directly to Tigo Guatemala’s corporate offices. In one specific instance by investigators, a helicopter carrying cash destined for Valladares made an emergency landing at a military base in 2013, nearly exposing the scheme. This cash was not corporate slush; it was frequently “clean, untraceable cash” purchased from drug traffickers who needed to launder their revenue. Valladares’s cooperation and the subsequent trail of documents allowed the DOJ to map the flow of money from criminal organizations into the pockets of legislators, securing the evidence needed to charge Comcel.

The 2021 Acquisition: Breaking the Deadlock

For years, Millicom’s ability to investigate its own subsidiary was paralyzed by its corporate structure. Although Millicom held a 55% stake in Tigo Guatemala, a shareholder agreement gave operational control to its local partner, Mario López Estrada. This arrangement blocked Millicom’s compliance teams from accessing serious financial records or interviewing key personnel. The local partner’s faction, referred to in court documents as “Shareholder 1,” actively obstructed internal probes and shielded the bribery network from scrutiny.

The shifted permanently in November 2021. Millicom executed a $2. 2 billion acquisition of the remaining 45% stake from its local partner, taking full ownership of the operation. This buyout dismantled the firewall that had protected the corrupt actors. With total control, Millicom replaced the local management team and handed over previously inaccessible documents to the DOJ. This cooperation was decisive; it allowed prosecutors to verify the “new evidence” discovered in 2020 and finalized the chain of custody for the illicit payments. The timeline illustrates the serious junctures where corporate maneuvering intersected with the federal investigation.

Timeline of the Tigo Guatemala Investigation (2015, 2025)

Year	Event	Key Development
2015	Voluntary Disclosure	Millicom reports chance irregularities to DOJ and Swedish authorities.
2018	Case Closure	DOJ closes the initial inquiry due to insufficient evidence and absence of access.
2020	Investigation Reopened	DOJ discovers new evidence of ongoing bribery and money laundering links.
2020	Valladares Charged	Former Tigo executive charged by DOJ; reveals cash-for-bribes mechanics.
Nov 2021	Millicom Buyout	Millicom pays $2. 2 billion for full control, removing the obstructionist local partner.
2022-2024	Full Cooperation	Millicom provides unrestricted access to Comcel records, confirming the scheme.
Nov 2025	Final Settlement	Comcel agrees to DPA and pays $118. 2 million penalty.

Operational Control vs. Ownership

The distinction between ownership and control proved central to the DOJ’s final sentencing calculation. Prosecutors acknowledged that while Millicom was the majority owner during the bribery period, it was a hostage to its minority partner’s operational command. The Department of Justice’s filings explicitly noted that the Guatemalan shareholder “used its operational control to prevent Millicom from accessing serious information.” This fact pattern allowed Millicom to negotiate a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) rather than a guilty plea for the parent company, and secured a 50% reduction in the criminal fine. The settlement underscored a harsh reality for multinational corporations: majority shares do not guarantee governance, and joint ventures can become black boxes of liability when local partners hold the keys to the vault.

Strategic Buyout of the Minority Partner for $2. 2 Billion

On November 12, 2021, Millicom International Cellular S. A. executed a decisive financial maneuver that fundamentally altered the governance and compliance trajectory of its Guatemalan operations. The Luxembourg-based telecommunications group acquired the remaining 45% equity interest in Tigo Guatemala from its local joint venture partner, Miffin Associates Corp, for a cash payment of $2. 2 billion. This transaction, the largest single foreign direct investment in Guatemala’s history at the time, ended a decades-long partnership that had become the epicenter of a massive corruption investigation.

The acquisition was not a consolidation of financial assets a serious remedial step in the face of mounting legal peril. For years, Millicom held a 55% majority stake in the joint venture absence operational control, a governance structure that the Department of Justice later identified as a key vulnerability. The local partner, controlled by Guatemalan businessman Mario López Estrada, retained significant sway over daily operations and government relations. Federal prosecutors would later allege that the “Guatemalan shareholder” used this control to orchestrate bribery schemes and block Millicom’s attempts to investigate internal misconduct. By buying out the minority stake, Millicom unilaterally seized full operational authority, allowing it to purge the executive ranks and implement the compliance measures required to resolve the FCPA investigation.

To fund the $2. 2 billion purchase, Millicom initially secured a facility from a consortium of international banks. This short-term financing was subsequently refinanced through a combination of long-term debt and equity. In early 2022, the company issued approximately $1. 5 billion in new debt and raised roughly $750 million through a rights offering. While this move temporarily increased the company’s use ratio to approximately 3. 1x, executives justified the expense as immediately accretive to operating cash flow. The deal was projected to add $200 million to Millicom’s equity free cash flow in its full year, driven by the elimination of minority dividends that had previously flowed to Miffin Associates.

Tigo Guatemala Ownership Restructuring (November 2021)

Metric	Pre-Transaction Status	Post-Transaction Status
Millicom Ownership	55%	100%
Minority Partner	Miffin Associates (45%)	None
Operational Control	Shared / Local Partner Dominance	Millicom Full Control
Transaction Value	N/A	$2. 2 Billion (Cash)
Financing Method	N/A	Loan, Debt Issuance, Rights Offering

The strategic rationale extended beyond the balance sheet. With the exit of the local partner, Millicom dismantled the legacy power structures that had facilitated the bribery of Guatemalan officials. The company immediately replaced the board of directors and installed new executive leadership untainted by the previous administration’s practices. This “clean break” was explicitly by the DOJ in its 2025 settlement as a significant factor in granting Millicom credit for remediation. The department noted that once the local shareholder’s obstruction was removed, Millicom provided “extensive and timely” cooperation, including the production of documents that had previously been withheld.

Market analysts viewed the buyout as a high- bet on the stability of the Guatemalan market, which served as Millicom’s most profitable region. Tigo Guatemala generated approximately $1. 5 billion in revenue in 2020, with EBITDA margins exceeding 50%. By consolidating 100% of these cash flows, Millicom sought to offset the debt incurred from the purchase while insulating the broader group from the reputational toxicity of the corruption scandal. The transaction severed the link between the global parent company and the individuals alleged to have directed the illicit payments, allowing Millicom to present a sanitized corporate profile to U. S. regulators during the final years of the investigation.

Breakdown of the 60 Million Criminal Penalty

The financial core of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) resolution with Comunicaciones Celulares S. A. (Comcel), trading as Tigo Guatemala, centers on a criminal penalty of $60 million. This specific figure, finalized in the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) on November 12, 2025, functions as a punitive measure for the conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Unlike the accompanying forfeiture, which aims to recoup ill-gotten gains, this fine directly penalizes the corporate entity for its role in the widespread bribery of Guatemalan officials between 2012 and 2018.

Federal prosecutors calculated this penalty using the U. S. Sentencing Guidelines, which provide a mathematical framework for determining appropriate corporate fines based on the severity of the offense and the company’s culpability. For Tigo Guatemala, the advisory fine range was determined to be between $120 million and $240 million. The final $60 million levy represents a 50% reduction from the bottom of this applicable range. This substantial discount show the DOJ’s continued emphasis on incentivizing corporate cooperation, even in cases involving high-level corruption and links to narcotrafficking proceeds.

Tigo Guatemala Criminal Penalty Calculation (November 2025)

Component	Figure	Notes
U. S. Sentencing Guidelines Range	$120, 000, 000 , $240, 000, 000	Based on offense severity and culpability score.
Applied Reduction	50%	Maximum credit for cooperation and remediation.
Base Calculation Point	$120, 000, 000	The low end of the advisory range.
Final Criminal Fine	$60, 000, 000	Payable to the U. S. Treasury.
Administrative Forfeiture	$58, 198, 343	Disgorgement of profits (separate from fine).
Total Monetary Resolution	$118, 198, 343	Combined financial impact on Millicom/Tigo.

The 50% reduction, the maximum available under the DOJ’s Corporate Enforcement Policy for companies that do not voluntarily self-disclose immediately later provide extraordinary cooperation, was awarded even with a complex investigative timeline. Millicom International Cellular S. A., the parent company, initially reported chance misconduct in 2015. yet, the DOJ found that Tigo Guatemala’s then-minority shareholder, who held operational control, actively blocked the internal investigation and withheld serious evidence. This obstruction forced the DOJ to close its initial inquiry in 2018 without charges. The case was only reopened in 2020 after federal agents uncovered independent evidence that bribe payments were partially funded by laundered narcotrafficking proceeds.

Once Millicom acquired full ownership and operational control of Tigo Guatemala in 2021, the company’s cooperation shifted from obstructed to “extraordinary.” The DOJ credited the firm for providing all relevant facts, making witnesses available, and engaging in extensive remedial measures. These measures included terminating the employment of executives involved in the scheme and overhauling the company’s internal compliance controls. Consequently, prosecutors agreed to the $60 million fine rather than seeking a penalty closer to the $240 million upper limit.

The payment structure mandated by the DPA required Tigo Guatemala to wire the forfeiture amount of $58. 2 million within ten business days of the agreement’s execution. The $60 million criminal fine follows a strict payment schedule outlined in the settlement documents, ensuring the U. S. Treasury receives the full amount during the two-year term of the deferred prosecution. This penalty stands as one of the largest criminal fines paid by a Guatemalan telecommunications entity in U. S. history, signaling a rigorous enforcement stance against foreign subsidiaries that use the U. S. financial system to corruption.

The Mechanics of the Clawback: $58. 2 Million in Forfeited Profits

While the $60 million criminal penalty punishes Comunicaciones Celulares S. A. (Tigo Guatemala) for its conduct, the second half of the financial settlement serves a different purpose: stripping the company of the money it made through corruption. The Department of Justice (DOJ) mandated an administrative forfeiture of exactly $58, 198, 343. This sum represents the “pecuniary gain” or illicit profits the company generated directly from the business advantages secured via bribery. Unlike the fine, which is punitive, this forfeiture restores the by removing the financial benefit of the crime.

Federal prosecutors calculated this figure by isolating the revenue streams attached to specific corrupt acts. Between 2012 and 2018, Tigo executives directed cash payments to Guatemalan government officials to influence legislation and regulatory decisions. The DOJ determined that without these bribes, Tigo would not have maintained its dominant market position or secured favorable terms for its 4G LTE spectrum authorization. Consequently, every dollar of profit attributed to those specific regulatory wins was classified as “proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense.”

Breakdown of Tigo Guatemala’s $118. 2 Million Settlement

Component	Amount (USD)	Legal Classification	Purpose
Criminal Penalty	$60, 000, 000	Criminal Fine	Punishment for violating the FCPA (50% reduction applied).
Illicit Profits	$58, 198, 343	Administrative Forfeiture	Disgorgement of financial gains derived from bribery.
Total Payment	$118, 198, 343	Total Resolution	Complete settlement amount paid to the U. S. Treasury.

The forfeiture process in this case utilized “administrative forfeiture,” a method that allows the government to seize assets without a separate criminal conviction of the company itself, provided the entity agrees to the terms. Tigo admitted that the funds used to pay the bribes, frequently delivered in duffel bags and sometimes sourced from narcotrafficking proceeds, directly paved the way for the $58. 2 million in corporate earnings. The agreement treats these earnings as fruit of the poisonous tree. By agreeing to the forfeiture, Tigo relinquished any claim to these funds, transferring them directly to the United States Treasury.

This financial clawback emphasizes the DOJ’s focus on the economic reality of corporate crime. A fine alone might be viewed as a cost of doing business, the dollar-for-dollar removal of illicit profits ensures the bribery scheme yields a net negative return. For Millicom, the parent company, this meant writing a check for profits that had likely already been booked, distributed, or reinvested years prior. The $58. 2 million figure was not negotiated down; it was a mathematical calculation of the specific benefits Tigo bought with its bribes.

The Two-Year Probation: Strict Compliance and the “Sword of Damocles”

The Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) finalized on November 12, 2025, between the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and Comunicaciones Celulares S. A. (Tigo Guatemala) establishes a rigorous, two-year probationary period that places the company under a federal microscope. Unlike standard three-year agreements common in Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) resolutions, this truncated timeline reflects the DOJ’s recognition of Millicom’s extensive pre-settlement remediation. yet, the terms remain severe: Tigo Guatemala must operate with zero tolerance for compliance failures or face immediate prosecution for the original conspiracy charge.

Under the agreement, the DOJ has suspended the criminal prosecution of Tigo Guatemala for two years, provided the company adheres to specific, non-negotiable conditions. The most serious of these is the requirement for “ongoing cooperation.” Tigo is legally bound to assist the DOJ’s Criminal Division Fraud Section and the U. S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida in any current or future investigations. This obligation extends beyond passive compliance; the company must affirmatively disclose any new evidence of corruption, including chance violations of the newly enforced Foreign Extortion Prevention Act (FEPA), which the demand side of bribery.

A pivotal component of the DPA is the mandate for enhanced corporate governance regarding communication. The agreement explicitly requires Tigo Guatemala to implement and enforce a strict policy governing “ephemeral messaging” platforms. This clause addresses the DOJ’s growing concern over the use of disappearing message apps (like WhatsApp or Signal) to conceal illicit communications. Tigo must maintain records of business communications on these platforms, ensuring that the “digital paper trail” is not deliberately erased by executives or third-party agents.

The agreement also substitutes an independent compliance monitor with a self-reporting structure, a concession granted due to the company’s voluntary disclosures. Instead of funding an external monitor, Tigo Guatemala and its parent company, Millicom, must submit a detailed report to the DOJ within one year (by November 2026). This report must detail the status of their remediation efforts, the testing of their compliance program, and the results of internal audits. At the conclusion of the two-year term, the CEO and CFO of both Tigo Guatemala and Millicom must personally certify that the compliance program is reasonably designed to detect and prevent future violations. This certification carries personal liability for the executives, raising the for internal oversight.

The consequences of breaching this agreement are absolute. If the DOJ determines that Tigo Guatemala has violated any term of the DPA, whether by failing to report new misconduct, withholding evidence, or lapsing in compliance controls, the suspension is lifted. The DOJ can then proceed with the prosecution using the “Statement of Facts” signed by the company as a binding admission of guilt. In this scenario, Tigo would be barred from contradicting the admitted facts in court, guaranteeing a conviction.

Summary of DPA Obligations (2025, 2027)

Table 14. 1: Key Terms of the Tigo Guatemala Deferred Prosecution Agreement

Obligation Category	Specific Requirement	Deadline / Frequency
Probationary Term	Suspension of criminal prosecution contingent on full compliance.	2 Years (Ends Nov 12, 2027)
Reporting	Submission of a detailed report on remediation and compliance testing.	One year from signing (Nov 2026)
Executive Certification	CEO and CFO must certify the effectiveness of the compliance program.	At conclusion of term (Nov 2027)
Data Retention	Implementation of policies to preserve business records on ephemeral messaging apps.	Immediate & Continuous
Cooperation	Mandatory disclosure of new evidence regarding FCPA or FEPA violations.	Ongoing
Breach Consequence	Immediate prosecution using signed Statement of Facts as admissible evidence.	Anytime during term

Millicom International Cellular S. A., while not a defendant, is a signatory to the DPA and shares the load of these obligations. The parent company has committed to “significant restructuring” of its global compliance program, a process that includes a reported 800% increase in dedicated compliance headcount since the investigation began. This massive resource allocation is a direct response to the DOJ’s requirement that the compliance function must be “, independent, and well-resourced” to prevent the recurrence of the widespread bribery that characterized the 2012, 2018 period.

Absence of an Independent Compliance Monitor

In a significant concession to Millicom International Cellular S. A., the Department of Justice (DOJ) declined to impose an independent compliance monitor as part of the November 2025 deferred prosecution agreement (DPA). This decision, rare in cases involving high-level bribery and narcotrafficking proceeds, allows Tigo Guatemala to retain control over its internal oversight method rather than submitting to an external, government-appointed auditor. The absence of a monitor avoids estimated costs that frequently exceed $10 million annually for multinational corporations in similar FCPA settlements.

The DOJ justified this leniency by citing Millicom’s “extensive and timely remedial measures” executed after the company acquired full operational control of Tigo Guatemala in 2021. Prosecutors determined that the telecommunications giant had already stress-tested its compliance framework sufficiently to prevent future misconduct. Instead of an external monitor, the DPA mandates a two-year period of self-reporting. Under this arrangement, Millicom must submit annual reports directly to the DOJ’s Fraud Section, detailing the status of its compliance program and the results of its internal testing.

Remediation and Program Enhancements

The decision to forgo a monitor hinged on specific, verifiable actions taken by Millicom’s leadership to the corrupt structures established by its former joint venture partners. Between 2015 and 2025, Millicom increased its dedicated global compliance headcount by 800%, a metric prosecutors highlighted as evidence of a cultural shift. Following the 2021 acquisition, the company terminated all Tigo Guatemala executives implicated in the bribery scheme, including the General Manager and the Head of Legal.

Beyond personnel changes, the company integrated data analytics into its transaction monitoring systems to flag high-risk payments in real time. The DOJ specifically credited the implementation of a strict policy governing ephemeral messaging applications, platforms frequently used to conceal illicit communications. These technical and policy upgrades persuaded authorities that Millicom’s internal controls were mature enough to function without external supervision.

DOJ-Credited Remedial Measures (2021, 2025)

Category	Specific Action Taken	Impact on Settlement
Personnel	Termination of culpable executives; 800% increase in compliance staff.	Demonstrated commitment to accountability.
Technology	Deployment of automated continuous monitoring and data analytics.	Allowed for real-time detection of irregularities.
Policy	New controls on ephemeral messaging and third-party onboarding.	Closed gaps used for bribery payments.
Oversight	Centralized reporting lines to Millicom global headquarters.	Removed local autonomy that facilitated the scheme.

Reporting Obligations and DPA Term

The deferred prosecution agreement carries a term of two years, shorter than the standard three-year period frequently applied in corporate FCPA resolutions. During this window, Millicom bears the load of proving the effectiveness of its anti-corruption program. The company must conduct ongoing reviews of its internal accounting controls and certify that its compliance program is reasonably designed to detect and prevent violations of the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws.

Failure to meet these self-reporting standards or the discovery of new misconduct during the two-year term could result in the DOJ scrapping the agreement and prosecuting the original conspiracy charges. yet, the DOJ’s assessment concluded that the risk of recidivism was low, primarily because the misconduct was driven by a minority shareholder group that Millicom has since bought out and removed.

The 15 Million Dollar Execution Fee Kickback Loop

Following the operational compromise of the cash-by-helicopter delivery system in 2013, Tigo Guatemala’s leadership required a new, less conspicuous method to generate liquid funds for bribery. Federal prosecutors identified a sophisticated financial instrument used to transfer corporate capital into the hands of the bribery ringleaders without alerting compliance auditors. In 2014, Millicom International Cellular S. A. entered into a commercial agreement with its local joint venture partner, a Panamanian entity controlled by Mario López Estrada. This agreement, structured as a “put-call option,” granted Millicom the right to purchase the remaining 45% stake in Tigo Guatemala at a future date.

The serious component of this transaction was a $15 million “execution fee” paid immediately to the minority shareholder. While the contract appeared to be a standard corporate hedging instrument, Department of Justice (DOJ) filings from November 2025 reveal its true purpose. The $15 million payment served as a direct injection of clean capital into the accounts of the local partner, who then converted these funds into cash to sustain the bribery payroll. This method laundered the bribe money at the source, disguising it as a legitimate acquisition cost within Millicom’s global balance sheet.

Table 16. 1: The Execution Fee Laundering pattern (2014)

Step	Originating Entity	Recipient Entity	Transaction Type	Stated Purpose	Actual Use
1	Millicom International	Panamanian Holding Co.	Wire Transfer ($15M)	Option Execution Fee	Bribe Fund Seeding
2	Panamanian Holding Co.	Local Guatemalan Accounts	Internal Transfer	Dividend/Profit Share	Cash Generation
3	Local Operatives	Guatemalan Officials	Cash Payments	None (Undocumented)	Legislative Votes

The timing of this $15 million transfer coincided with a period of intense legislative activity in the Guatemalan Congress. The funds allowed the conspiracy to maintain its schedule of monthly payments to legislators, known internally as “support,” which ensured the passage of laws favorable to Tigo’s market dominance. Specifically, this capital influx supported the “Superintendency of Telecommunications” legislation, which consolidated Tigo’s control over radio frequency spectrums. By routing the money through a high-level corporate transaction, the conspirators bypassed the need for physical cash smuggling, which had nearly exposed the scheme a year prior.

Acisclo Valladares Urruela, Tigo’s Chief Corporate Affairs Officer, played a central role in managing the distribution of these funds once they reached Guatemala. The 2025 Statement of Facts details how Valladares and the minority shareholder directed the flow of this cash to specific deputies and government ministers. This “execution fee” loop represents a significant evolution in the sophistication of the bribery scheme, moving from crude physical transport of narcotics proceeds to complex financial engineering that utilized the parent company’s own treasury to fund illegal activities against its knowledge.

The DOJ’s 2025 settlement documents confirm that this specific $15 million fee was a primary engine for the corruption that occurred between 2014 and 2015. It allowed the bribery operations to continue without interruption during a period when external scrutiny on Guatemalan banking was increasing. The discovery of this specific transaction dismantled the defense that the bribery was solely the work of rogue local employees, as it linked the funding directly to a headquarters-approved financial agreement, even if the parent company was unaware of the fee’s illicit destination at the time.

The 2025 Enforcement: “America ” and the FCPA

The resolution of the Tigo Guatemala case in November 2025 served as a bellwether for the Department of Justice’s recalibrated method to corporate crime under the second Trump Administration. Following the inauguration in January 2025, Attorney General Pamela Bondi initiated a strategic review of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), culminating in the February 10, 2025, Executive Order titled “Pausing Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement to Further American Economic and National Security.” This directive imposed a 180-day moratorium on new FCPA investigations, allowing the DOJ to pivot its resources toward cases with direct links to national security, transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and cartel activity.

The Tigo settlement emerged as the major corporate resolution following the lifting of this pause in late 2025. It signaled that while the administration sought to reduce regulatory load on “routine” business practices, it would aggressively prosecute corruption involving organized crime. The factual basis of the Tigo case, specifically the that bribe payments were funded partly through “laundered proceeds of narcotrafficking”, placed it squarely within the new administration’s enforcement priorities. This intersection of corporate bribery and cartel finance allowed prosecutors to frame the $118. 2 million penalty not as a regulatory enforcement action, as a national security victory.

even with the political shift, the mechanics of the settlement demonstrated a pragmatic continuity with the Corporate Enforcement Policy (CEP) revised in 2024. The 50% reduction in the criminal fine granted to Tigo’s parent company, Millicom, adhered strictly to the CEP’s guidelines for “extraordinary cooperation” and remediation. This decision underscored a serious message to multinational corporations: the “America ” DOJ would still honor the leniency framework for companies that self-disclose, provided the misconduct did not compromise U. S. national interests.

The Whistleblower Factor

The 2025 enforcement environment was also shaped by the maturation of the DOJ’s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program, launched in August 2024. By mid-2025, this program had created a “race to the courthouse”, pressuring companies to self-report before employees could file claims for a share of forfeiture proceeds. In the Tigo case, the DOJ noted that Millicom’s cooperation included “proactively disclosing evidence about which the department was previously unaware,” a necessary step to secure the DPA in an era where whistleblower tips were surging.

Table 17. 1: 2025 DOJ Corporate Enforcement Timeline

Date	Event	Significance
Feb 10, 2025	Executive Order Pausing FCPA	Halts new investigations for 180 days; orders review of enforcement guidelines.
May 12, 2025	Galeotti Memo Issued	Defines new “High-Impact” priorities: Cartels, National Security, Trade Fraud.
June 2025	New FCPA Guidelines Released	Resumes enforcement with focus on TCO links and safeguarding U. S. competitiveness.
Nov 10, 2025	Tigo Guatemala DPA Filed	post-pause resolution; $118. 2M penalty; narcotrafficking links.

The administration’s “Focus, Fairness, and Efficiency” doctrine, outlined in the May 2025 memo by Criminal Division Head Matthew Galeotti, explicitly deprioritized cases involving “technical” violations or minor courtesies. Instead, resources were reallocated to complex schemes involving significant corruption. The Tigo case, with its systematic bribery of congressmen and use of helicopter-delivered cash, met this high threshold. The DOJ’s handling of the matter illustrated that while the volume of FCPA cases might decrease under the new guidelines, the severity and financial impact of individual resolutions would likely remain high.

” not punish American businesses for competing in global markets, ruthlessly target those who partner with cartels to subvert the rule of law.”
, Attorney General Pamela Bondi, Remarks on the Resumption of FCPA Enforcement, June 2025.

Q&A: The Strategic Shift

Q: Why did the Trump DOJ settle the Tigo case even with the FCPA pause?
A: The case was already advanced (investigation reopened in 2020) and, crucially, involved narcotrafficking proceeds. This aligned with the administration’s priority of targeting transnational criminal organizations.

Q: Did the 2025 policy changes weaken the FCPA?
A: The volume of new investigations dropped due to the 180-day pause, the Tigo penalty shows that the DOJ retained the capacity to levy massive fines for serious conduct. The focus shifted from “broken windows” policing of small bribes to “high-impact” prosecutions.

Q: How did the Whistleblower Pilot Program affect 2025 outcomes?
A: It forced companies to accelerate internal investigations. Millicom’s decision to cooperate extensively was likely influenced by the risk of insiders reporting the narcotrafficking links directly to the DOJ for a financial reward.

Remediation Efforts and Internal Control Overhauls

The Department of Justice (DOJ) entered into a two-year Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) with Comunicaciones Celulares S. A. (Tigo Guatemala) in November 2025, resolving the investigation into the bribery scheme. Federal prosecutors the company’s extensive remediation as a primary factor for declining to impose an independent compliance monitor. The agreement mandates that Millicom International Cellular S. A. and its subsidiary submit periodic reports to the DOJ regarding the status of their compliance programs throughout the DPA’s term. This resolution included a $60 million criminal penalty and $58. 2 million in forfeiture, reflecting a 50 percent reduction from the bottom of the applicable U. S. Sentencing Guidelines range.

Millicom executed a complete overhaul of its Guatemalan subsidiary’s leadership structure immediately after acquiring full ownership in November 2021. The company terminated the general manager and other executives directly implicated in the misconduct. To prevent future isolation of local operations, Millicom established a direct reporting line from Tigo Guatemala’s compliance function to the global corporate headquarters. This structural change eliminated the autonomy that previously allowed the joint venture partner to block internal investigations and conceal financial records from the parent company.

New technical controls govern internal communications and financial transactions. Tigo Guatemala implemented a strict policy regarding ephemeral messaging applications, requiring employees to acknowledge the protocol annually while the company maintains systems to preserve and analyze these communications. The compliance team also deployed advanced data analytics and automated continuous monitoring tools to scrutinize third-party payments. In the lead-up to the settlement, the company tested over 250 specific transactions to verify the effectiveness of these new financial guardrails.

The of the compliance expansion reflects a decade-long restructuring effort. Millicom increased its dedicated global compliance headcount by 800 percent over ten years, significantly resourcing its risk assessment processes. This expansion allowed for the centralization of third-party onboarding and oversight, removing those functions from local control where the bribery scheme originated. The DOJ noted that these measures, combined with the company’s cooperation after 2021, demonstrated a functioning compliance program capable of detecting and preventing further corruption without external monitorship.

Key Remediation Measures Implemented by Millicom

Control Category	Specific Actions Taken
Personnel	Termination of implicated executives; appointment of new management and compliance staff in Guatemala.
Oversight Structure	Creation of direct reporting lines from local compliance to global headquarters; centralization of third-party onboarding.
Technical Controls	Implementation of ephemeral messaging policies; deployment of automated data analytics for transaction monitoring.
Resource Allocation	800% increase in global compliance headcount; enhanced risk assessment.

Impact on Tigo Brand Reputation in Central America

The immediate aftermath of the November 2025 Department of Justice (DOJ) settlement revealed a clear disconnect between corporate accountability and consumer behavior in Central America. While the $118. 2 million penalty marked a significant legal and reputational blow on the international stage, Tigo Guatemala’s market dominance insulated it from the type of catastrophic consumer flight frequently seen in competitive markets. Financial data from the fourth quarter of 2025 indicates that the scandal’s impact was largely contained to regulatory and political spheres, with negligible effect on the operator’s subscriber base or revenue streams.

Contrary to expectations of a consumer boycott, Millicom’s Q4 2025 financial reports show that Tigo Guatemala achieved record operational cash flow, with an EBITDA margin reaching 54%. The operator continued to grow its postpaid subscriber base, adding thousands of new users in the very months the settlement was finalized. This resilience highlights the rigidity of Guatemala’s telecommunications duopoly, where Tigo and Claro control nearly the entire market, leaving dissatisfied customers with few viable alternatives.

Consumer Sentiment vs. Market Reality

Public reaction in Guatemala was characterized by a mix of apathy and cynicism rather than organized outrage. Local media outlets, including Prensa Libre and El Periódico, emphasized the contrast between the swift action of U. S. authorities and the perceived impunity of local officials involved in the scheme. yet, this editorial criticism did not translate into a mass exodus of subscribers. Social media sentiment analysis from late 2025 shows that while negative brand associations increased, specifically linking the Tigo name to “corruption” and “bribery”, service reliability and coverage remained the primary drivers of consumer choice.

Table 19. 1: Tigo Guatemala Operational Metrics (Q4 2025)

Metric	Q4 2025 Performance	Year-over-Year Change	Context
Service Revenue	$366 Million	+3. 6%	Growth continued even with November settlement news.
EBITDA Margin	54. 0%	+1. 4%	Highest margin in over five years, driven by cost.
Postpaid Net Adds	Positive Growth	Stable	Migration from prepaid to postpaid remained steady.
Stock Reaction (TIGO)	+2. 09% (Post-Earnings)	Positive	Investors priced in the settlement as a “resolved risk.”

Regional Contagion and Regulatory Headwinds

While the consumer base in Guatemala remained stable, the reputational damage manifested significantly in regional regulatory affairs. The most tangible occurred in Costa Rica, where the telecommunications regulator, SUTEL, definitively rejected a proposed merger between Millicom (Tigo) and Liberty Latin America in November 2025. Although the rejection was officially grounded in anti-trust concerns regarding market concentration, industry analysts note that the timing coincided precisely with the DOJ’s corruption. The scrutiny placed on Millicom’s compliance and governance structures likely hardened the regulator’s stance against allowing such a dominant entity to form.

Competitor reaction across the region was notably muted. América Móvil’s Claro, the primary rival, did not launch aggressive marketing campaigns explicitly targeting the corruption scandal. Instead, Claro focused on its own network expansion, reporting a 10% revenue increase in Central America for Q4 2025. a strategic decision to avoid a “mud-slinging” war that could draw attention to the broader industry’s historical governance challenges in the region.

Corporate Remediation Strategy

In response to the settlement, Millicom accelerated its “Compliance ” messaging for 2026. The company emphasized that the corrupt acts were orchestrated by a former local partner before Millicom acquired full ownership in 2021. The remediation plan presented to investors included:

“The termination of all personnel involved in the misconduct, the implementation of a new global compliance program, and the complete overhaul of the local management team in Guatemala to ensure with international ethical standards.”

Investors appear to have accepted this narrative. Millicom’s stock price stabilized and even rose following the settlement, as the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) removed a long-standing uncertainty from the company’s outlook. The market treated the $118. 2 million payment as a one-time “cost of doing business” rather than a structural threat to the brand’s viability.

Final Case Status and Executive Certifications (2026-2027)

As of February 22, 2026, Comunicaciones Celulares S. A. (Comcel), trading as Tigo Guatemala, operates under the strict supervision of the United States Department of Justice. Following the November 12, 2025, execution of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA), the telecommunications provider is three months into a serious two-year probationary period. The criminal information charging the company with conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) remains filed suspended. This legal “Sword of Damocles” ensures that if Tigo Guatemala or its parent company, Millicom International Cellular S. A., breaches the agreement terms before November 2027, the DOJ can immediately resume prosecution using the company’s own admitted Statement of Facts as evidence.

The settlement, finalized after a brief enforcement pause in early 2025, mandates rigorous self-policing in the absence of an independent compliance monitor. Instead of an external watchdog, the DOJ placed the load of proof directly on Millicom’s leadership. Under the terms of the DPA, the company must submit annual reports documenting the testing and effectiveness of its anti-corruption controls. These reports must demonstrate that the remediation efforts, which include the termination of culpable executives and the implementation of data analytics for transaction monitoring, are not paper policies functional blocks against bribery.

The C-Suite Liability: 2027 Certification Requirements

A defining feature of this resolution is the requirement for high-level executive certification, a policy emphasized in revised DOJ corporate enforcement guidelines from 2025. At the conclusion of the two-year term in late 2027, Millicom’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) must personally certify that the company’s compliance program is reasonably designed to detect and prevent future violations. This certification is not a formality; it carries chance criminal liability for the signatories if they provide false assurances to federal prosecutors. This requirement forces the C-suite to maintain active, granular oversight of Tigo Guatemala’s operations throughout the DPA term.

Table 20. 1: Tigo Guatemala DPA Key Obligations (2025-2027)

Obligation Category	Specific Requirement	Status (Feb 2026)
Probationary Term	24 Months (Ends Nov 2027)	Active (Month 3)
Financial Penalty	$60, 000, 000 Criminal Fine	Paid
Asset Forfeiture	$58, 198, 343 (Illicit Profits)	Paid
Monitorship	Self-Reporting (No Monitor)	In Progress
Executive Sign-off	CEO & CCO Certification	Pending (Due 2027)

The absence of a monitor reflects the DOJ’s credit for Millicom’s extensive cooperation after it acquired full ownership of Tigo Guatemala in November 2021. Once the parent company secured operational control from its local joint venture partner, it voluntarily exposed the misconduct, which involved cash payments to Guatemalan congressmen and the laundering of funds through sham contracts. The DOJ awarded a 50% reduction off the bottom of the applicable U. S. Sentencing Guidelines fine range, saving the company approximately $60 million al penalties. This discount signals a clear prosecutorial strategy: companies that purge bad actors and self-disclose, even after a delay caused by minority-owner obstruction, can secure favorable terms.

Visualizing the Financial Impact

The total financial resolution of $118. 2 million stands as a significant warning to foreign subsidiaries operating in high-risk jurisdictions. The chart illustrates the bifurcation of the penalty, distinguishing between the punitive criminal fine and the disgorgement of profits gained through the bribery scheme.

Looking ahead, Tigo Guatemala faces a transformed operational reality. The company has dismantled the method used for bribery, including the use of “emergency” cash funds and unclear consulting agreements. The focus shifts to sustainability. For the 21 months, every high-value transaction and government interaction be subject to the enhanced scrutiny promised in the DPA. Success means a dismissal of charges in 2027; failure means a return to federal court and the chance for vastly increased penalties.

**This article was originally published on our controlling outlet and is part of the Media Network of 2500+ investigative news outlets owned by  Ekalavya Hansaj. It is shared here as part of our content syndication agreement.” The full list of all our brands can be checked here. You may be interested in reading further original investigations here.